![]() 07/01/2014 at 15:38 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Price Bracket Vs. Power bracket. Both are long distance cruisers, both (might) pack 700 Highway Passings, one's got 'murican muscle, the other's got italian exclusivity. Only one will give you three pedals. Which one do you want, oppo?
![]() 07/01/2014 at 15:41 |
|
They're both from the same company. I'd buy the F12 as an investment, I'd buy the Challenger for the "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!" factor.
![]() 07/01/2014 at 15:48 |
|
I seriously wonder how these would do in a comparison test considering the Ferrari is 4 times the price of the Hellcat.
![]() 07/01/2014 at 16:24 |
|
F12 because V12.
![]() 07/01/2014 at 17:30 |
|
F12 because Dodge.
![]() 07/01/2014 at 19:05 |
|
F12? A cruiser? That's funny.
![]() 07/01/2014 at 22:17 |
|
Hellcat because insurance, maintenance, fuel, practicality etc
![]() 07/02/2014 at 00:47 |
|
Why is that funny? It's considered a GT car, which in turn is often referred to as a cruiser.
![]() 07/02/2014 at 00:51 |
|
The F12, a million times over. While the Hellcat has a "cool" factor, it couldn't hold the F12s jockstrap. Besides, while they may not be factory builds, I've seen more than a couple tuned Challengers with that kind of power. Also, in a day in age where 1000hp is relatively common, a 700hp Challenger just doesn't impress me that much. Maybe I'm crazy but I see the Challenger as a bit "meh" and more of a parlor trick or gimmick than anything...
![]() 07/02/2014 at 02:50 |
|
I've never heard of "GT car" being synonymous with "cruiser".
A GT car is fast, but comfortable enough to sustain high speeds for long distances. A cruiser is comfortable, relaxing and cushy, but not necessarily fast. There is nothing relaxing about the F12.
![]() 07/02/2014 at 04:14 |
|
Hmm, other than long ago when referring to land yachts, I've always head them used synonymously.
![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:26 |
|
F12 all damned day. 700 horse, but it's still just a Dodge